International System of Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Inter content System of jurist - Essay ExampleUntil recently, these atrocities and affronts to ideals of humanity went unpunished by national judicial systems and there was urgent postulate to put in place a system of arbitrator that would protect the world-wide human rights as enshrined in the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights (Roht-Arriaza, 1995). The decade was marked by the foot of internationalist criminal justice mechanisms and the application of a universal jurisdiction that would ensure that those who participate in crimes against humanity are held to account for their actions. Due to inherent obstacles in applying justice for such crimes, the mechanisms developed surrender continued to be marred with failure despite the numerous strides that have been experienced. After the Cold warfare period and the horrific acts that took place in the former Yugoslavia and the genocide in Rwanda coupled with the miserable failures of national courts of justice to bring perpetrators of crimes against humanity to account for their acts, major international actors including the United Nations (UN), a number of governments and international nongovernmental (NGOs) organizations came up to form international criminal courts. ... In1998, the United Nations adopted the Statute that would lead to the creation of a permanent external Criminal Court as a complementary to national courts of justice with the designate to act in cases where the national courts are unable or unwilling to investigate and/or operate (Schabas, 2007 Schiff, 2008). It is burning(prenominal) to note that the concept of international system of justice include standards governing rendering of justice to all on an international scale and the conduct of war and standards that define the fundamental human rights. to the highest degree of these requirements of have achieved a degree of recognition internationally over the past few decades in specify the types of criminal conduct by states against other states or against individuals or ethnic groups. In this regard, the varied definitions of rampageous crime amid countries due to dissimilarities in both legal and statistics recording methods have made international comparisons problematic. The law of armed or violent conflict has generally been applied to define conflict between states with little or no attention to internal armed conflict. However, there have been some developments in international law to especially through the Geneva Conventions to protect civilians during internal armed violence (Moir, 2002) International Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction With international criminal law infiltrating the legal systems of many states, the linguistic rule of complementarity, which stipulates the only subsidiary competence of the ICC vis-a-vis national jurisdictions, comes to be seen as one of the most important features of the ICC Statute (Schabas, 2007 Bellamy, 2009). The principle of